Liz Coleman’s call to reinvent liberal arts education
Ray Kurzweil: A university for the coming singularity
The Impending Demise of the University by Don Tapscott (Edge.org)
“Academic Earth is an organization founded with the goal of giving everyone on earth access to a world-class education.” <home>
I am very honored to share, on my 100th post, a phenomenal website with learning aspirations that mirror those of the OpenLearning project.
From their mission statement:
“We are building a user-friendly educational ecosystem that will give internet users around the world the ability to easily find, interact with, and learn from full video courses and lectures from the world’s leading scholars. Our goal is to bring the best content together in one place and create an environment in which that content is remarkably easy to use and where user contributions make existing content increasingly valuable.” <about>
I encourage you to take a moment to browse the lectures available in a clean and accessible format covering a wide range of subjects from a variety of universities and professors. Also, take a look at their great playlists.
Two years ago I posted about hyperrealism. Rarely have I discovered a topic that has fascinated me more–I haven’t really stopped thinking about the concept since. Specifically, I have been intrigued by the notion of “the natural” and what this means for individuals psychologically (do terms like “real” and “natural” have the same meaning and carry the same weight they used to? And what does/will this mean for us?). I remember hearing about a behavioral construct and a series of fascinating experiments in an introductory social psychology course I took many years ago that, until today, I could not recall…
“A superstimulus is an exaggerated version of a stimulus to which there is an existing response tendency, or any stimulus that elicits a response more strongly than the stimulus that normally releases it.
Konrad Lorenz observed that birds would select for brooding eggs that resembled those of their own species but were larger. Niko Tinbergen, following his extensive analysis of the stimulus features that elicited food-begging in the chick of the herring gull, constructed an artificial superstimulus consisting of a red knitting needle with three white bands painted round it; this elicited a stronger response than an accurate three-dimensional model of the parent’s head (white) and bill (yellow with a red spot).
It is sometimes argued that phenomena such as sexual fetishes and the taste for junk food can be partially explained as examples of superstimulation. Modern artefacts may activate instinctive responses which evolved in a world without shiny fabrics or double cheeseburgers, where shiny skin was a sign of health in a prospective mate, and fat was a vital nutrient.” <wiki>
My favourite (living) philosopher, Daniel Dennett, on Cute, sexy, sweet, funny:
Couple of short essays that really captured my interest in the subject:
- Superstimuli and the Collapse of Western Civilization (from Overcoming Bias, March 2007)
- Why We Haven’t Met Any Aliens (from SEED magazine, May 2006)
Elizabeth Gilbert on a new way of thinking about creativity.
“Eat, Pray, Love” Author Elizabeth Gilbert muses on the impossible things we expect from artists and geniuses — and shares the radical idea that, instead of the rare person “being” a genius, all of us “have” a genius. It’s a funny, personal and surprisingly moving talk.
Here are five great books on writing and a creative life. These are not “tip books” or self-help guides, they will not give you a quick-and-easy shortcuts or try to convince you that anything but practice and effort will make you a better writer and a more creative person. This short list represents a small sample of some of the best titles out there and come heavily recommended. Read one of these books, and you will no doubt devour the rest in turn. So, lets begin.
1) On Writing Well by William Zinsser
“This book is as engaging as it is instructive. It’s so easy to read and understand, you can’t help but improve. It spells out everything that’s wrong most people’s writing, then provides simple solutions. You’ll cut pounds of fat from your writing. Your sentences will sparkle and your paragraphs will dance. Best of all, your readers will read, not groan.”
Read more reviews of this book.
.
2) Bird by Bird by Anne Lamott
“I’m hooked on Lamott. She slaps me in the face with her startling revelations, nudges me in the ribs with her unpredictable humor, and prods my frozen little writer’s hands back into action with warm compassion. This book won’t solve the mechanical aspects of my writing, or lead me on the path of structural excellence, but it will spark my creativity, free my characters to be true to themselves, and, ultimately, shake me from my doldrums back into the writing mode.”
Read more reviews of this book.
3) The Creative Habit by Twyla Tharp
“I’ve seen many books on creativity, but this is by far the most practical and accessible one I’ve read. Tharp knows that it takes hard work and good habits to create something tangible, and she doesn’t waste our precious time on mystical mumbo jumbo or some magical “way” of the artist. It’s the work, folks.”
Read more reviews of this book.
.
4) On Writing by Stephen King
“No matter if you are a non-writing King-reader or if you are a writing King non-reader, On Writing will entertain, teach, and open your eyes to the complex world of (creating) fiction. ‘Creating’ fiction, because it is not just writing in proper grammar that makes a book good. It is the determination, the love, feel and creativity the author pours into his/her piece. And King most certainly brought all these points – and more – very well together.”
Read more reviews of this book.
5) The Elements of Style by William Strunk Jr. and Roger Angell
“Put the principles laid out in this slim book to use, and you will write better than ninety-nine percent of college educated Americans. Anyone reading your writing will thank you for it.”
Read more reviews of this book.
Women have contributed to science from its earliest days, but as contributors they have generally not been acknowledged. Historians with an interest in gender and science have illuminated the contributions women have made, the barriers they have faced, and the strategies implemented to have their work accepted. <wiki>
Some statistics and an interesting perspective. Maybe it’s time to reframe the question?
- “Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering” <wiki> Slideshow <.pdf>
- In ‘Geek Chic’ and Obama, New Hope for Lifting Women in Science
- Women in Science by Philip Greenspun
- Society for Canadian Women in Science and Technology <home>
“Extremophiles were first discovered just 40 years ago in the hot springs of Yellowstone National Park. Since their discovery, scientists around the world have worked to find how extremophiles might be useful to humans, and how they might harm humans. Thermophiles were the first extremophile to be discovered, but other extremophiles have been found living in ice, deep under the surface of the ocean, in salty environments, and in environments with both high and low Ph levels. The United States, Germany, and Japan are three of the countries that are searching for extremophiles. Scientists have found a few extremozymes that can be used today. As scientists continue to search, they will find more.
When these organisms were found living in harsh environments that would kill any other organism, scientists began trying to understand how they were able to survive. The proteins inside extremophiles each adapted to the habitat where the extremophile lived. It was discovered that each type of extremophile had enzymes that were resistant to extreme heat, saline, acids, high/low Ph, and high barometric pressure.
Since extremophiles use proteins in different ways than other microorganisms do, scientists are working on adding a sixth kingdom in the classification of life just for the extremophiles. This classification will be called archea and it will include all prokaryotic and eukaryotic extremophiles.”
– from History of Extremophiles
“Tardigrades (or “water bears”) are polyextremophiles and are able to survive in extreme environments that would kill almost any other animal. Some can survive temperatures close to absolute zero, temperatures as high as 151 °C (303 °F), 1,000 times more radiation than any other animal, nearly a decade without water, and even the vacuum of space.” <wiki>
The Deep Ocean: a ribbon of life (David Gallo) –
More on underwater astonishments.
“Astrobiology is the field concerned with forming theories, such as panspermia, about the distribution, nature, and future of life in the universe. In it, microbial ecologists, astronomers, planetary scientists, geochemists, philosophers, and explorers cooperate to constructively guide the search for life on other planets. Astrobiologists are particularly interested in studying extremophiles, as many organisms of this type are capable of surviving in environments similar to those known to exist on other planets. For example, Mars may have regions in its deep subsurface permafrost that could harbor endolith communities. The subsurface water ocean of Jupiter’s moon Europa may harbor life, especially at hypothesized hydrothermal vents at the ocean floor.” <wiki>
- What is exobiology?
- The Search for Extremophiles on Earth and Beyond: What is extreme here may be just business-as-usual elsewhere by Penelope Boston
- Does Life Exist Elsewhere in the Universe? (California Academy of Sciences)
Antarctic ‘resources’ at risk — Antarctic organisms face an onslaught by prospectors anxious to exploit their unique nature, the United Nations says. <link>
“Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere.”
Carl Sagan
“It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what you see.”
Henry David Thoreau
“Every great advance in science has issued from a new audacity of the imagination.”
John Dewey
“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For while knowledge defines all we currently know and understand, imagination points to all we might yet discover and create.”
Albert Einstein
“Think of it as a theater, from a lighting and engineering standpoint. But it’s not a performance space. It’s an engagement space.”
Jay Walker
“Nature Deficit Disorder, a term coined by Richard Louv in his 2005 book Last Child in the Woods, refers to the alleged trend that children are spending less time outdoors, resulting in a wide range of behavioral problems. Louv claims that causes for the phenomenon include parental fears, restricted access to natural areas, and the lure of the screen. Recent research has drawn a further contrast between the declining number of National Park visits in the United States and increasing consumption of electronic media by children.
Louv spent 10 years traveling around the USA reporting and speaking to parents and children, in both rural and urban areas, about their experiences in nature. He argues that sensationalist media coverage and paranoid parents have literally “scared children straight out of the woods and fields,” while promoting a litigious culture of fear that favors “safe” regimented sports over imaginative play.” <wiki>
Five Dangerous Things Kids Should Do:
“Colony Collapse Disorder (or CCD) is a phenomenon in which worker bees from a beehive or Western honey bee colony abruptly disappear. While such disappearances have occurred throughout the history of apiculture, the term Colony Collapse Disorder was first applied to a drastic rise in the number of disappearances of Western honey bee colonies in North America in late 2006. European beekeepers observed similar phenomena, albeit to a lesser degree.
The cause or causes of the syndrome are not yet fully understood, although many authorities attribute the problem to biotic factors such as Varroa mites and insect diseases (i.e., pathogens including Nosema apis and Israel acute paralysis virus). Other proposed causes include environmental change-related stresses, malnutrition and pesticides (e.g. neonicotinoids such as imidacloprid), and migratory beekeeping.” <wiki>
Note: In the most recent episode of The Simpsons (Season 20, Ep.08), Lisa’s subplot refers to the current world wide disappearance of bees. <DailyGreen>
Wikipedia describes anti-intellectualism as “a sentiment of hostility towards, or mistrust of, intellectuals and intellectual pursuits. This may be expressed in various ways, such as attacks on the merits of science, education, art, or literature.” And goes on to say that anti-intellectuals, “often perceive themselves as champions of the ordinary people and populism against elitism, especially academic elitism. These critics argue that highly educated people form an isolated social group tend to dominate political discourse and higher education.” <wiki>
This idea strikes me as particularly interesting because anti-intellectualism seems to be, for the most part, the basis for the anti-scientific perspective. Of course there are real concerns and criticism that exist in regards to intellectual institutions (such as certain approaches to education and science), but to be fundamentally opposed to the pursuit of intellectual development itself? This belief is fascinating because of its self-limiting character.
Where do these sentiment stem from? What are their origins?
And perhaps more importantly, what can be done to curb their spread and growth?
Surrounding the recent US presidential election, and even before, this topic gained a lot of attention. Here is a selection of articles that highlight this important issue and shed light on why we should care about the role of anti-intellectualism in political and international affairs.
- The Dumbing of America, by Susan Jacoby ( Feb. 2008 )
- How Anti-Intellectualism Is Destroying America, by Terrance McNally ( Aug. 2008 )
- The American anti-intellectual threat, by Jeffrey Sachs ( Sept. 2008)
- Palin appeals to America’s anti-intellectualism, by Brendon O’Connor ( Oct. 2008 )
- Goodbye, Anti-intellectualism. Brains are Back!, by Michael Hirsh ( Nov. 2008 )
With the last word, its zefrank.
