You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Politics’ category.
A couple weeks ago Christopher Hedges (American Fascists, 2007; Empire of Illusion, 2009; The Death of the Liberal Class, 2010) was interviewed on TVO’s The Agenda. TVO blogged last week that Steve Paikin’s interview with Hedges back in October of 2010 became one of their most-watched YouTube videos, with almost fifteen-thousand views. Hedges’ latest Agenda interview, with Piya Chattopadhyay as part of The Agenda in the Summer, aired last week, and has been viewed almost 8,300 times already…
Day One: Chris Hedges calls them “sacrifice zones,” huge pockets of impoverished America on the verge of cementing a permanent underclass. The Pulitzer Prize winning journalist has teamed up with cartoonist Joe Sacco in his latest project “Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt” to shed some light on this issue. He joins Piya Chattopadhyay for more on his warning. <link>
Day Two: Chris Hedges on what he sees as the consequences of an uneven distribution of wealth: destruction, violence and revolt. He tells Piya Chattopadhyay what the Occupy movement should be about and how best to deal with these socioeconomic issues in the public discourse. <link>
More recently however, here is the lecture that revitalized by passion for this man and his work:
Journalist and author Chris Hedges delivers a lecture based on his book Death of the Liberal Class. Hedges argues that there are five pillars of the liberal establishment – the press, liberal religious institutions, labor unions, universities and the Democratic Party – but that these institutions have failed the constituents they purport to represent. <link.
You can also hear these TVO talks, as I prefer, in podcast form.
Wikipedia describes anti-intellectualism as “a sentiment of hostility towards, or mistrust of, intellectuals and intellectual pursuits. This may be expressed in various ways, such as attacks on the merits of science, education, art, or literature.” And goes on to say that anti-intellectuals, “often perceive themselves as champions of the ordinary people and populism against elitism, especially academic elitism. These critics argue that highly educated people form an isolated social group tend to dominate political discourse and higher education.” <wiki>
This idea strikes me as particularly interesting because anti-intellectualism seems to be, for the most part, the basis for the anti-scientific perspective. Of course there are real concerns and criticism that exist in regards to intellectual institutions (such as certain approaches to education and science), but to be fundamentally opposed to the pursuit of intellectual development itself? This belief is fascinating because of its self-limiting character.
Where do these sentiment stem from? What are their origins?
And perhaps more importantly, what can be done to curb their spread and growth?
Surrounding the recent US presidential election, and even before, this topic gained a lot of attention. Here is a selection of articles that highlight this important issue and shed light on why we should care about the role of anti-intellectualism in political and international affairs.
- The Dumbing of America, by Susan Jacoby ( Feb. 2008 )
- How Anti-Intellectualism Is Destroying America, by Terrance McNally ( Aug. 2008 )
- The American anti-intellectual threat, by Jeffrey Sachs ( Sept. 2008)
- Palin appeals to America’s anti-intellectualism, by Brendon O’Connor ( Oct. 2008 )
- Goodbye, Anti-intellectualism. Brains are Back!, by Michael Hirsh ( Nov. 2008 )
With the last word, its zefrank.
“Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for a public debate in which the U.S. presidential candidates share their views on the issues of The Environment, Health and Medicine, and Science and Technology Policy.” <home>
Click here to support Science Debate 2008
“The UChannel (also known as the University Channel) makes videos of academic lectures and events from all over the world available to the public. It is a place where academics can air their ideas and present research in a full-length, uncut format. Contributors with greater video production capabilities can submit original productions.
The UChannel presents ideas in a way commercial news or public affairs programming cannot. Because it is neither constrained by time nor dependent upon commercial feedback, the UChannel’s video content can be broad and flexible enough to cover the full gamut of academic investigation.” <about>
Check out how it works.